Re: [NTG-context] Problems with fonts

On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:25:22PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:

...

It should work out ok if you change the map file line to either:

cmr12 LMRoman12-Regular

This didn't work.

...

or

cmr12 CMR12

This worked. Now, things are quite all right, except that I am still unhappy with the rendering in Acrobat. But at least the things seem to be mostly solved with this one.

Thanks for all the help, but one final question before I give up! IF I use pdflatex, this is the header of a PS file I get upon doing dvips: %!PS-Adobe-2.0 %%Creator: dvips(k) 5.95b Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software %%Title: myfile.dvi %%Pages: 1 %%PageOrder: Ascend %%BoundingBox: 0 0 595 842 %%DocumentFonts: CMR17 CMR12 CMBX12 CMR10 CMMI12 CMEX10 CMSY8 CMMI8 CMR8 %%+ MSBM10 CMR7 CMBX10 However, for ConTeXt, the output I get is: %!PS-Adobe-2.0 %%Creator: dvips(k) 5.95b Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software %%Title: test.dvi %%Pages: 1 %%PageOrder: Ascend %%BoundingBox: 0 0 595 842 %%DocumentFonts: LMRoman12-Regular CMR12 LMMathItalic9-Italic %%+ LMMathItalic12-Italic LMMathSymbols10-Italic Now, is there any way to force the fonts to map on to the old CMR names? That is because I feel it is because of the CMR/lmodern issue that pdflatex generated PDFs appear properly, while ConTeXt ones don't. What should the map file look like? Also, please find the Debian default map file here: http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/original-public-lm.map.gz Thanks for bearing with me. I want to try my best before giving up, failing which I will be forced to return to teTeX (with the old ConTeXt) and miss out on some new ConTeXt niceties, such as \startalign etc. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036