On 6 Apr 2020, at 02:54, Wolfgang Schuster <wolfgang.schuster.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
Gerben Wierda schrieb am 06.04.2020 um 00:41:I got this error after I had changed some lua code:
tex error > tex error on line 272 in file archimate-lua.new: ! Undefined control sequence
warnIfVerbose( "Breaking off the processing of node %s\nNo
l...eak xsi:type", node)
\luat_start_lua_code_indeed ...ormalexpanded {\endgroup \noexpand \directlua {#1
}}
l.272 \stopluacode
<empty file>
The control sequence at the end of the top line of your error message was never
\def'ed. You can just continue as I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
I have been looking at that code for over two hours, not seeing anything wrong with it. But I’ve now finally found the culprit and I still do not get it.
The culprit was:
warnIfVerbose( "Breaking off the processing of %s\n No elementRef", node)
The problem goes away when I use:
warnIfVerbose( "Breaking off the processing of %s\nNo elementRef", node)
(I don’t want the line after the node is printed to begin with a space).
But the lack of space between \n and N kills lua (apparently). For completeness (as string.format and texio.write_nl are also in play):
function warnWithLabelIfVerbose( str, ... )
if verboseProgram then
texio.write_nl( str .. string.format(...))
end
end
function warnIfVerbose( ... )
warnWithLabelIfVerbose("-----> ", ...)
end
Is this a lua bug? A ConTeXt bug? Expected behaviour? And if so, why is reported that on line 272 (where \stopluacode is) is the error? Or is the error message indeed helpful and do I just lack the know how to interpret it?
ConTeXt expands TeX commands in a luacode-environmentand when you have \n followed by text you create a newcommand with starts with \n but since it isn't definedyou get a error message.In the example below the commented block producesthe same error message as you get.\starttext%\startluacode%print("text\ntext")%\stopluacode\startluacodeprint("text\n text")\stopluacode\stoptext
OK, thanks. This means the ConTeXt environment mixes standard TeX (where \nfoo would be considered a TeX command) and lua string substitution (where \nfoo would mean a newline followed by foo), correct? I understand why that happens (otherwise one would have to escape all \ characters directed at TeX) but it really took me hours (because I did not understand the error message that correctly told me \Nno was the problem). It’s what you see depends on what you are looking for, I guess.
Maybe a warning in the documentation (or maybe there is one and I missed it)
G