Mojca wrote:
Singular and plural don't always suffice.
Yes ... I was studiously avoiding bringing that up. :-) I suppose one would end up with separate languages like es-s-m, es-s-f, es-pl-m, es-pl-f for the converter to invoke. Then es would be a synonym of the most common form (singular masculin, probably). Hans wrote:
so where is the dutch?
(there's no converters.verbose in my core-con.lua) What version are you using? converters.verbose was put in on november
I might ask the same of you. :-P Anyway, I've written one up. I'll post it later, after I've had a chance to adapt it to the structure you lay out in the new beta. Acidrums wrote: 12. Are you using the latest beta, or the TeX Live 2012 stable version? As for the error you got: Try the new beta Hans just uploaded, Spanish conversions are working in that one. E.g. \ctxcommand{verbose(123, "es")}. The bugs we discusses in a previous mail are also still in there --- I'll try to get around to them. Cheers, Sietse