On 8/17/2021 4:47 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
Hi Hans,
On 17 Aug 2021, at 16:39, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context
wrote: I am still interested in this luacondition 733 allthough the culprit has been spotted. Very nasty typo and hard to spot fo me.
The “luacondition 733” is the \ifxmlatt . You get these numbers because the command is defined using lua ‘interfaces.implement’ (lxml-ini.lua) instead of directly as a TeX conditional.
And yes indeed, the new lua-defined commands are hard to derive from the log information (for the other Hans: is this reporting not controlled via ‘public=true’ ? ). no, that's just namespacing, but we have a trick that can be used to resolve it and I simply hadn't that one plugged into the conditions stuff (only in functions) ... so i did that and next time HvdM will see:
(\end occurred when luacondition \ifxmlatt on line 13 was incomplete) although of course he will never make that mistake again so he will not notice this new feature Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------