Hello, Project structure use quite often, but yet similar question not occurred to me. I had always previously PPP and CCC as existing filenames on the disk. I suppose it would be right. But I would like to extend Luke's question on this issue: You can load an existing component to other components? Is it acceptable or undesirable? At some point I would throw this possibility, but I do not want to do something that could then backfire somehow. Thanx Jaroslav Hajtmar Dne 28.2.2012 17:37, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. napsal(a):
Hello,
I'm trying to use advantages of project/product/component structure.
Suppose having a very simple example (both files in the same directory):
---- Prod.mkiv \startproduct PPP \component Comp.mkiv
Product \stopproduct ----
And:
---- Comp.mkiv \startcomponent CCC Component \stopcomponent ----
When I compile Comp.mkiv, I get (successfully) text "Component".
When I compile Prod.mkiv, I get (successfully) text "Product Component".
So the question - what are "PPP" and "CCC" identifiers (following \startproduct and \starcomponent respectively) used or intended for?
- So far, it seems to me that I refer to file names (as with \input) when working with components rather than their ids assigned by \startcomponent or \startproduct.
What would be a situation when I'd need to use ids "CCC" or "PPP" (or later, those assigned by "\startproduct PROD" and "\startenvironment ENV")?
Best regards,
Lukas
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________