Hi:
Please, shut up and code: we need to fix these bugs first!
Yue Wang
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Marcin Borkowski
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisał(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM,
wrote: ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
yes, true.
Not entirely (see below).
Also LaTeX peaple always have used to say that LaTeX is better than ConTeXt is true
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has heaps of bugs.
There are some bugs.
As in most software projects. And, that;s true, there _are_ lots of bugs in ConTeXt. But still, it is very usable.
LaTeX rocks...!
true, if you are from LaTeX peaple.
Well, I've been using LaTeX for several years and I don't think it to be really rocking. And neither is ConTeXt (yet) - see below.
And the question is: why to start yet another flame war?
I am the proof (by example) that the sets of plain TeX people, LaTeX people and ConTeXt people have a nonempty intersection. There are areas where LaTeX is much better than ConTeXt: when I write a paper on maths, almost no journal will accept ConTeXt. Also, LaTeX is very stable and ConTeXt is not. OTOH, when ConTeXt reaches the maturity level of LaTeX, it _will_ be much better - but we'll have to wait a while for it to happen.
Greets
-- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl)
Emacs: Escape-Meta-Alt-Control-Shift. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________