![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
6 Dec
2005
6 Dec
'05
5:10 p.m.
Vit Zyka wrote:
But generally it is not a clean solution. Can be solved counting number of layers in one pass and defining in the second, but... Hans, do you think is the grouping problem doable? If yes I will put the note to the collector.
it's kind of tricky to make definitions global (since it hooks into framed and such) so, the best is to do more testing and/or do assignment in layer definitions global you can make it a low priority entru in the collection Hans