On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Renaud Aubin wrote:
Hi Folks !
I'm currently writting a technical report in which I need to type some XML an non-XML text.
Sample file (xml_test.tex): I have some custom XML text (trivial) + a not-so-complicated xsl transformation (a part is included within the test file). I know there is verb-xml but... I need to improve it to support xpath expr. More over, I want to preserve the initial indentation. The point is now, how to improve verb-xml to support xpath expressions ? I'm working with Mark II... Should I switch to Mark IV if I want to write a new XML verbatim support (with lua)?
I would suggest to switch to Mark IV since writing support for verbatim is considerably simpler in Mark IV. Lua is much easier to program than TeX :-)
+ the bonus question: I want to add some support for the RelaxNG Compact syntax, should I follow the procedure described on the wiki or switch to Mark IV ?
Switch to Mark IV.
The deadline for this technical report: end of october...
It time becomes an issue, you can always try t-vim to get syntax highlighting using vim. Aditya