On 2010-12-18 <20:58:01>, Philipp A. wrote:
hi, do you really support this obsolete statement?
if so: why?
- html mail is supported by every mail reader nowadays, and nowhere near broken - semantic html is way better for blind people than plain text, since it is, well, semantically structured. something enclosed in em-tags will e.g. pronounced in a accentuated voice by the screen reader. - e mail sizes are no problem with today's hd capacity - every proper mail reader does block pics from foreign sources for privacy reasons
essentially: this was true, and isn't anymore.
if you think http://www.xkcd.com/386 , you are right, i'm like that :)
I refuse to discuss this matter outside a pub.
cu in the context forum, philipp
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments