On Sat, Mar 27 2010, Michael Saunders wrote:
Notice that Yan Zhou isn't complaining that the docs are old. Our problem is that they are sketchy and rambling, bits and pieces of this and that without any systematic explanations. Often they are just some unexplained code samples that communicate nothing (unless you happen to be the guy who invented the language). I can't think of one command that is fully explained along with all its possible parameters. The wiki is better written, but even less complete. It might not be possible to do better, but this is a huge obstacle to anyone who actually wants to use ConTeXt. The docs hint at a lot of features that sound better than LaTeX, but actually getting them to work is a different story.
Hello Michael, See also here: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100308.123128.f65942c8.en.html Cheers, Peter -- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/