![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5faea8b4fa0adb143383811dc94f0d22.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi Mikael, I confirm that the latest beta (ConTeXt version 2016.08.11 13:56 MKIV beta) has the issue you are reporting. This bug is absent from the current version from TeXLive2016, that is ConTeXt version 2016.05.17 19:20 MKIV current. Some time ago I reported an analogous issue with startalign, and it seemed to me that Hans fixed it. But it appeared again with the beta 2016.08.11 13:56. Best regards: OK
On 17 Aug 2016, at 14:20, Mikael P. Sundqvist
wrote: Hi,
The test file
\starttext \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC \exp(t_1)\exp(t_2)\NC =x_1x_2=\exp(\ln(x_1x_2))\NR \NC \NC =\exp(\ln x_1+\ln x_2)=\exp(t_1+t_2).\NR[eq:explag1] \stopalign \stopformula
\placeformula \startformula 1+1=2 \stopformula \stoptext
gives the attached pdf. In the first formula, the location of the equation number seems to be wrong (I would have expected it to be to the right, like in the second example). In the (nice, but rather old now) My Way by Aditya, this does not seem to happen.
/Mikael
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________