![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/435ac0d0ecd67394ae88a2020214d815.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says ****************************************** \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}} \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{10.80}} \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}} \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}} \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{17.72}} \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{21.25}} ****************************************** Shouldn't it says ****************************************** \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.920}} \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{1.080}} \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}} \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}} \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}} \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}} ****************************************** ?
How do you get these variables? the symbols in lucida math are different. you can also refer to ftp://ftp.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/pub/TeX/CTAN/macros/latex/contrib/psnfssx/lucidabr/lucidabr.pdf. page 9, line 263-273
There is a strange behavior : if I put \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.930}} big is bigger than Big. How is this possible ?
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________