![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/af13db75aa1c24fee635c74fecf93090.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
You have generally right ... But I think that you must not take the measure of the devilish speed the development rate of development of ConTEXt :-) I often I make a text document using the Context and the resulting PDF document I put into Scribus. With Scribus I put graphics, titles etc. For normal use Scribus is a good choice. But you have right - for professional work in the end one needs a professional tool like InDesign or QuarkXpress. Jaroslav Dne 28.2.2012 23:26, Henning Hraban Ramm napsal(a):
But it still lacks a lot of essential features for professional work (at least in my area), e.g. usable master pages and nondestructional import of vector graphics (esp. PDF), CMYK and spot colors. Correct me if it gained these lastly - I know they're working on it, but the development speed is much much slower than ConTeXt’s. Maybe it’s more stable and reliable therefore...
Scribus has at least one feature that sets it ahead of InDesign (besides being Open Source): render frames (similar functionality as ConTeX’s filter module - replace foreign sourcecode by its result).