Hi, list! I've seen the following in Stack Exchange: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/503208/define-macro-that-scans-ahead... The answer is: \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{xparse} \NewDocumentCommand{\mymathsym}{e{^_}}{% x^{\mathrm{foo}\IfValueT{#1}{,#1}}_{\mathrm{bar}\IfValueT{#2}{,#2}}%} \begin{document} \begin{gather}\mymathsym \\\mymathsym^{\mathrm{extrasup}} \\\mymathsym_{\mathrm{extrasub}} \\\mymathsym^{\mathrm{extrasup}}_{\mathrm{extrasub}} \\\mymathsym_{\mathrm{extrasub}}^{\mathrm{extrasup}} \end{gather} \end{document} Such a macro contextually defines a behavior for a subscript and a superscript even if they aren't displayed in a specific order, so \mymacro_{a}^{b} \mymacro^{b}_{a} have the same output, even if the intended behavior is not the typical one (I could redefine it so subscripts change colors, for instance). Although I could just port the macro using xparse-generic because it works in ConTeXt too, how to define a macro like that the ConTeXt way, i.e., using only ConTeXt macros? Thank you in advance. Jairo :)