Bruce D'Arcus said this at Thu, 8 May 2003 23:34:43 -0400:
On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 06:10 PM, Adam Lindsay wrote:
So, other than font bugs, what's missing?
OSF variant, obviously (typographically, that'd generally be the default font).
Shall I rename the osft1.enc you sent me earlier as ecOSF.enc, and add that to the distribution? Have anything else to contribute?
I've also created variants to remap the superior and tabular figures into the normal figure slots. This produces nicer footnote marks (well, in LaTeX; don't know how to get it working in ConTeXt) in the first case, and nicer numeric tables on the other. I've only manually created these for the "regular" font, since there's little point in bold or italic numbers in either of these cases.
If you think other would be interested in this encoding, send it my way, and I'll throw it in there... adam -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk Computing Dept, Lancaster University +44(0)1524/594.537 Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-