On 1-2-2012 15:15, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader).
It is a bit difficult to demonstrate it with context (how to you use luatex without mkiv there?) but latex (or plain) it is quite easy:
The followings examples load pplr7t.vf. Both give the checksum mismatch message in the log if and only if the lua-fontloader luaotfload it also loaded:
%LaTeX \documentclass{article} \usepackage{luaotfload} \begin{document} \font\test=pplr7t \test abc \end{document}
%plain \input luaotfload.sty \font\test=pplr7t \test abc \bye
So the code from luaotfload (which is based on the context fontloader code) changes a checksum (either in the vf or in the tfm-information) and so the check in the luatex engines fails.
(Imho it is only a minor problem, vf-fonts are not much used with luatex).
Afaik nothing is done with a checksum. There is a checksum field in the loaded tfm but I don't think one has to be passed to luatex. Maybe one should be passed when a regular tfm file is used but even then, loading a vf file is independent. So, it's best to just ignore that message. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------