Ouch! Actually, Lucida worked with 2010.10.21 23:27 MKIV, but is broken in 2010.11.03 19:42 MKIV. I now see that I get the same error as you do: ! LuaTeX error ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/math-vfu.lua:529: attempt to index local 'rotcev' (a nil value) stack traceback: ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/math-vfu.lua:529: in function <...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/math-vfu.lua:374> (tail call): ? (tail call): ? ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/font-def.lua:633: in function 'read' ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/font-ctx.lua:430: in function 'stage_two' <main ctx instance>:1: in main chunk. system > error on line 1 in file luc.tex: LuaTeX error ... Hans? 2010/11/9 Herbert Voss wrote:
Am 09.11.2010 14:08, schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
Is it a problem with the definitions for otf in type-otf.mkiv, but using type1 instead of otf?
type-otf.mkiv is just a filename. The "otf" is partially there for historic reasons and doesn't imply that only OpenType fonts should be defined there, even though this is true for almost all fonts listed there. Typescripts for Lucida define the Type1 fonts. Your definition may solve the problem temporary, but most probably won't use the proper glyphs as soon as you try to compile a slightly more complex document. This needs to be fixed in ConTeXt. I'm sorry for not noticing earlier. I knew that I happily compiled a document with Lucida yesterday, but I didn't have the latest ConTeXt installed. Mojca