On 7/27/2021 1:20 PM, Michal Vlasák wrote:
I thought that recent Edge versions used Chrome's PDFium, as you say with some additions (like drawing). I would have to double check that.
yes but i think with their own additions (not sure about the pdf stuff) i do notice differences in printing so maybe that part is also different
My understanding is that U3D was the first thing they designed. It is standardised by ECMA, so freely available. Then they came up with PRC, which should be more space efficient IIRC. It is standardized by ISO, so it is open, but not free.
Both formats seemed to worked fine in Acrobat and Foxit and I don't see that changing soon.
Both have some writing support in open source tools - meshlab supports U3D export with https://github.com/ningfei/u3d, and Asymptote supports PRC export. Although I didn't get either to quite work and used export from Autodesk Inventor instead for my tests.
ok, so that might stay
Not fully official, but it is only logical that they need a compatibility layer for old documents. But, Adobe employee mentionts the use of OS Player for these Flash using documents here:
https://community.adobe.com/t5/acrobat-reader/playing-embedded-video-without...
ok
Do you mean table summarizing what parts of the Acrobat JavaScript API is supported in individual viewers?
There is a separate API for normal things:
https://opensource.adobe.com/dc-acrobat-sdk-docs/acrobatsdk/pdfs/acrobatsdk_...
ok
Do you mean existing PDFs that work in viewers or ConTeXt source files that use these features? I can provide both.
good
I am not sure what you mean by "small set of files for media".
proper freely distributable test files Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------