I believe Hans Hagen said this around Fri, 31 Jan 2003:
in math-eul you define a lot, like sin/cos etc
Oh, right, about those functions... I found that euler's characters are best set in isolation, and don't serve math functions very well. In the current document I'm setting, I've redefined mfunction to help relate math with the main text: \def\mfunction#1{{\em#1}} 1) is that the "right" way of doing it? 2) is it desirable to add to the definitions (where?) as a default? (I have \em set to italic, but others might prefer the default slanted.) -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Adam Lindsay +44(0)1524 594 537 atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/atl/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=