Matthias Weber said this at Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:13:50 -0500:
Old version:
ConTeXt ver: 2004.11.23 fmt: 2004.12.16 TeXExec 5.2.3
total run time : 324 seconds
New version:
ConTeXt ver: 2005.03.02 fmt: 2005.3.4 total run time : 416 seconds
And I was hoping for a speed increase by a factor of 4 :( (I renamed the TeX source for both runs)
Of course I am completely ignorant about the internals, but at least I didn't expect that it would run slower.
Were both runs from the same point--were they "virgin" runs? Did you precede the texexec command with a "texutil --purgeall" command, for example? -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-