On 2012-06-12 Hans Hagen
On 12-6-2012 13:42, Marco wrote:
On 2012-06-11 Philipp Gesang
wrote: Dear others, please contribute if you know about further setups whose parameters behave in a non-standard way.
Here's another candidate: \usepath
that's one that can be dealt with (I'll adapt that one)
While you're at it, check \usesubpath as well. I didn't test, but assume it has the same issue.
As this is quite counterintuitive, I’d like to wikify any known exceptions somewhere over here:
How about unifying the interface? IMO that would make more sense then bury the “caveats” somewhere deep in the wiki.
that's currently not feasable for all
What's the reason? Performance of backwards compatibility? Personally, I would sacrifice some runtime in favour of a more uniform interface. That's one of the main ideas that define ConTeXt and set it apart from other TeX macro packages. Regarding the backwards compatibility, wasn't MkIV the chance to introduce incompatible changes (changes for improving the user interface :)? Marco