2010/7/16 Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
<ishamid@colostate.edu>
Hi Peter,
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:05:19 -0600, Peter Münster <
pmlists@free.fr> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15 2010, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
Question for all: for MkIV, should we recommend ONLY natural tables to
newcomers, e.g., in a ConTeXt Book?
Hello Idris,
For me, it's yes! But newcomers need to pay attention in some cases:
- alignment (see issue http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=427 )
- TABLEhead is repeated, TABLEfoot is not
(see issue http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=116 )
Sure, hopefully by the time we get to that point the bugs will be fixed.
I also see that Wolfgang has wrapped some of the old Tables syntax into a module (as Aditya hinted)... I missed all of these developments :-)
The Tables syntax is certainly less verbose, and may be useful for beginners. But for pedagogical purposes it makes sense to consider Table/Tables deprecated, if not obsolete... So the pedagogical challenge is to make TABLE as easy as possible, perhaps teaching \start/stopTABLE as intro and \b/eTABLE as advanced.
A top-down approach
1) \bTABLE
2) \starttabulate
3) chapter 22 of TeXbook
1) is much easy than 2) which is much easy than 3
1) is slower than 2) which is slower than 3)
--
luigi