On 1/28/2016 11:45 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:43:24 +0100 Hans Hagen
wrote: On 1/27/2016 10:05 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
The new code appears to work in general, but only if no shading to transparent is being used:
\definecolor [trans] [a=multiply, t=.5, s=.5] \starttext \startMPcode % works fill fullcircle scaled 10cm withcolor \MPcolor{trans};
fill fullsquare xyscaled (15cm, 15cm) withshademethod "linear" withshadevector (0,1) % works withshadecolors (red,\MPcolor{blue}) % fails %% withshadecolors (red,\MPcolor{trans}) ; \stopMPcode \stoptext
How to make transparent shadings work with the new mechanism?
withtransparency (1,.5)
However, this makes the entire shade transparent. How to shade from one colour to transparent using withtransparency to achieve an effect like in the example below?
that isn't how shading works, it's a vector from one color to the other (same color space eventually) and transparency is a property of the whole
\definecolor [trans] [a=multiply, t=0] \setupbackgrounds [page] [background=color, backgroundcolor=lightgray]
\starttext \startMPcode fill fullsquare xyscaled (15cm, 15cm) withshademethod "linear" withshadevector (0, 1) %% colour doens't match %% withshadecolors (red, lightgray) %% output is ok with \MPcolor withshadecolors (red, \MPcolor{lightgray}) %% ?? %% withtransparency (1, .5) ; \stopMPcode \stoptext
Furthermore, why do the tex and MP colours differ? Wouldn't it make sense to use the same colour definitions? Or was that intentional?
it's already hard enough to have what we have now (tex and mp are different species) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------