Ok, I changed a bit the wiki. http://wiki.contextgarden.net/XeTeX#Document_Encoding Please, you who know :), check if you think it's ok. Best -a- On 16 Sep 2007, at 23:49, Hans Hagen wrote:
Andrea Valle wrote:
(Thanks Hans)
On 15 Sep 2007, at 18:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
Andrea Valle wrote:
\enableregime[utf]
this one is not needed, xetex is utf
Ok. I read some infos on the wiki but I was a bit confused. So:
- if I encode in utf-8 I don't have to specify regime \enableregime [utf] - if I encode in another encodign (e.g. mac roman) I have to specify \the correct \enableregime (here: [mac])
Am I right?
kind of ... i never tested regimes with xetex if only because i assume that xetex users use utf8 of have recoded their docs to utf8 -)
Hans
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ______________________________________________________________________ _____________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ______________________________________________________________________ _____________
-------------------------------------------------- Andrea Valle -------------------------------------------------- CIRMA - DAMS Università degli Studi di Torino --> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ --> andrea.valle@unito.it -------------------------------------------------- I did this interview where I just mentioned that I read Foucault. Who doesn't in university, right? I was in this strip club giving this guy a lap dance and all he wanted to do was to discuss Foucault with me. Well, I can stand naked and do my little dance, or I can discuss Foucault, but not at the same time; too much information. (Annabel Chong)