On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 15:28, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2-3-2010 14:49, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
hm, but for me name compatibility with every latex math package is no objective; i'd rather that we're unicode math compiant (and i don't care too much what route latex follows)
I would not care too much about LaTeX either, but what does Unicode compliance mean? \symbol{DOWNWARDS ARROW LEFTWARDS OF UPWARDS ARROW}?
Out of the whole vector only some 5-10% of glyphs works now.
is it that bad? interesting is that lucida was one of the first fonts context supported so the transition from yandy->tug has really messed up things then
It's not about messing things up, but about missing "mathname=" in char-def.lua for all the unicode entries for special glyphs. If those glyphs worked in MKII from the very beginning, they won't work before one adds several entries to But of course they should work flawlessly when they are entered as unicode characters. They only fail to work when one enters \zrangeantirestriction for example. Mojca