Hi Michal
Hm. It doesn't. I have to play a little with the distribution. teTeX 3.0 is much different from the old one, so it's possible I do some stupid things.
map file support keeps changing, which is why i prefer runtime loading
- at the last bachotek there was a talk about czech type design and one of the remarks was that fo rmany fonts this whole accent business was more a matter of taste than of quality (i will not quote the speaker on czech typesetting tradition here-)
Yes, it's about tastes. But I strongly do not like Latin Modern, especially iacute in sans bold. :-) Simply, I'm used to CS fonts. :-) And perhaps Latin Modern will be improved in the nearest future. I'll try to get used to it.
well, the computer sans is no beauty anyway, certainly not for much text -)
- just curious: do you always use cm fonts? there are other fonts with math nowadays
Well, I teach four different courses and I try to typeset documents for each course with a different font: Microeconomics with Computer Modern (CS fonts in Type1), Neoclassical Macro with Palatino (URW Palatino + math glyphs from pxfonts), Monetary Economics with Concrete (CM Super in Type 1 + math glyps in Metafont), and New Institutional Economics with Times (URW Times + math glyphs from txfonts). Are there more free fonts with math support? Other documents (with no math) I typeset with more fonts.
there is now also iwona (sansish) with math (antykwa is a not really for big docs, more for display) another nice alternative is utopia (with fourier) these are all on tex live (well, i say that with crossed fingers) Hans