Mikael P. Sundqvist mailto:mickep@gmail.com 6. September 2016 um 21:07
Dear all,
since I got no answer here I cross posted on stackexchange (see http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/328147/52406). Now, I got a solution to this from Aditya. It seems that it is not yet clear to me (or Aditya, as far as I understand from the reply) which float placements that respects the \setupfloats[indentnext=yes] and which not. Or more importantly, why.
To make this email thread more complete, the solution of Aditya adds
\unprotect \def\page_one_place_float_auto {\page_one_place_float_otherwise\nonoindentation} \def\page_one_place_float_bottom {\page_one_place_float_otherwise\nonoindentation} \def\page_one_place_float_margin {\page_margin_blocks_process_float\nonoindentation} \def\page_one_place_float_leftmargin {\page_one_place_float_side_indeed\page_sides_process_float_leftmargin\nonoindentation} \def\page_one_place_float_rightmargin{\page_one_place_float_side_indeed\page_sides_process_float_rightmargin\nonoindentation} \protect When backwards compatiblity is a reason for not changing this adding a hook can be solution, e.g.
-\def\page_one_place_float_auto {\page_one_place_float_otherwise} +\def\page_one_place_float_auto {\page_one_place_float_otherwise\rootfloatparameter\c!next} which can be used with \setupfloat[next=\indentation] Wolfgang