On 4/2/23 11:19, luigi scarso via ntg-context wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 11:06, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context
> <ntg-context@ntg.nl <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>> wrote:
>
> If you talk about the math font, I do not see what you mean. Daniel
> has worked a lot on his fonts, and they now work well.
>
>
> indeed the body font is not concrete opentype math but it looks very
> similar at first sight
Hi Luigi,
according to type-imp-concrete.mkiv, Concrete-Math.otf seems to be only
used for the math font.
> here evince & mupdf are quite ok (evince somewhat bolder than mupdf),
Well, evince displays it wrong (this is an already known issue with fake
bold fonts in evince/poppler, reported years ago
[https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues/645]).
hm, 4years ago, quite old... and this is not a fake bold, this is an instance of a variable font.
But yes, it seems that evince still has the same problem.
--
luigi