On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 21:20, Tom Maynard wrote:
While I'm pretty sure I didn't do anything wrong, and I'm absolutely certain that it worked perfectly yesterday, ConTeXt is broken:
C:\ConTeXt>path PATH=C:\ConTeXt\tex\texmf-mswin\bin;C:\Ruby187\bin;c:\bin;c:\tsepro;c:\program iles\vim\vim72;c:\cygwin\bin;C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_18\bin;C:\WINDOWS\ sstem32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\Program Files\ooRexx;c:\program files\MikTex 2.8\mktex\bin;c:\program files\MikTex 2.8\miktex\bin\miktex\bin\
C:\ConTeXt>context --version
MTXrun | forcing cache reload MTXrun | resolvers: warning: no lua configuration files found MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf' (runtime) MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf-local' (runtime) MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf-context' (runtime) MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf-mswin' (runtime) MTXrun | resolvers MTXrun | resolvers MTXrun | the resolver databases are not present or outdated MTXrun | resolvers: using suffix based filetype 'lua' MTXrun | resolvers: using suffix based filetype 'lua' MTXrun | resolvers: remembering file 'mtx-context.lua' MTXrun | resolvers: using suffix based filetype 'lua' MTXrun | unknown script 'context.lua' or 'mtx-context.lua' C:\ConTeXt>
And then I deleted it all, reinstalled Minimals, and get exactly the same result. Is my luck really this bad? What to do?
Are the binaries in C:\ConTeXt\tex\texmf-mswin\bin or C:\ConTeXt\texmf-mswin\bin? That is - with or without tex? The information above is a bit confusing. What does mtxrun --generate return you? Apart from that - you are welcome to test if ConTeXt works fine on MikTeX (2.9). Mojca