Am 10.09.19 um 13:16 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 9/9/2019 10:05 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
Bump
On 9/3/19 4:46 AM, Oliver von Criegern wrote:
Dear list members,
is there any way to get a cross reference to a column in a two column layout?
yes and no:
no : there is not something buil tin yes: one can write some hack in a few lines
but instead of posting such a hack (which then will a live of its own) i'll add a feature:
\pagereference[column:#1]
\doifelsereferencefound{column:#1}{\number\referencecolumnnumber}{}
in the next beta,
Hans
This would be great, thanks! Best regards, Oliver
At least, I would need to get some value that tells me whether the target is in the left or in the right column. How to achieve this?
This is the more simplified version of the my previous question cited below.
Best regards, Oliver.
Dear list members,
how can I create cross references to column numbers?
I have a two column layout with column numbers in the header instead of page numbers (actually, these column numbers are calculated from the page numbers). Now I want to create a cross reference that returns the column number of the target. How can I achieve this?
Of course, I can get the page number with \pagereference (for the target) and \at (for the reference), but for calculating the column number (according to what I did in the header), I would also need to know whether the target is in the left or in the right column, and I can't see how I can get this information.
For an example, see the question posted by me at stackexchange: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/502944/context-cross-references-to-c...
Besides, I am wondering, regarding the generally very regular and consistent naming of commands in ConTeXt, why this is not so in the case of references. For example, to refer to a page, I need \pagereference (for the target) and \at (for the reference); to refer to a line, I need \someline (for the target) and \inline (for the reference), but only if I want it to automatically add the word "line" or something else before the number, otherwise I have to use \inlinerange. It took me some time to find that out. Wouldn't it be easier to have just one command for the target and another one for the reference, and everything else, as counters and headers to be returned, text to be added etc. to be configured by options? Because all these \in \at \about ... give back different things (a
Am 12.08.19 um 15:26 schrieb Oliver von Criegern: title, a number, a range, a ...) and packaging all that in one macro doens't make it cleaner so soon users will then wrap complex calls in a macro of their own (which then can clash with some existing name).
Also, the ref mechanism evolved over decades and we're not going to drop compatibility.
Hans
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- Dr. Oliver von Criegern Referat für IT und Digital Humanities Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Alfons-Goppel-Str. 11 80539 München Tel.: 089-23031-1310