3 Aug
2015
3 Aug
'15
9:42 a.m.
Hi Hans,
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:13:34 -0600, Hans Hagen
On 8/3/2015 4:56 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
what would be the proper name for such a conversion? simplearabic? arabicdigits?
[myconversion] [١,٢,٣,٤,٥,٦,٧,٨,٩,١٠, ١١,١٢,١٣,١٤,١٥,١٦,١٧,١٨,١٩,٢٠, ۲۱,۲۲,۲۳,۲٤,۲٥,۲٦,۲۷,۲۸,۲۹,۳۰, another million entries
the next beta will have:
\setuplinenumbering[conversion=arabicdecimals]
What's wrong with 'persiannumerals' and 'arabicnumerals' which we had before? They are not supposed to by synonymous for abjadnumerals... In any case we need U+: [0030-0039] -> [0660-0669]: arabicdecimals U+: [0030-0039] -> [06F0-06F9]: persiandecimals Best wishes Idris -- Idris Samawi Hamid Professor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523