22 Apr
2005
22 Apr
'05
4:36 p.m.
Hi Hans,
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:16:47 +0200, Hans Hagen
i'm not that much in favour of capitalized named (clashes with user commands as well as some internals), so \scbf is more likely
Heh, heh, that was my original idea; with 2-char capitals I was trying to find a way to help you avoid the late nights, headaches, etc.-) but if \tfa, etc. will soon be obsolete and replaced with \sizea etc., then we I'm quite happy to go back to \scbf etc. In any case whatever high-level framework we come up with should largely be determined by your decision on the low/mid-level framework. Best Idris -- Professor Idris Samawi Hamid Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523