On 17 May 2017, at 17:17, Hans Hagen
wrote: On 5/17/2017 8:35 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thanks for having fixed the behavior of the prime in the latest beta release (ConTeXt version 2017.05.15 21:48). However, as you may see in the two attached PDF files, the result is still incorrect when one types for example $f_2’’(x)$, which should give
The correct behaviour is that obtained with mkii. Indeed one can circumvent the behaviour of the latest beta release of mkiv by using tricks such as the ones in the example code below, but this should be avoided in my opinion.
well, it depends on how one sees this '' mess
the problem with primes is that in macro packages they are messy entities
Den 18 maj 2017 10:13 fm skrev "Otared Kavian"
add to that the fact that the symbol itself is a funny positioned
something already raised in a font or not i.e. sometimes in need of superscript and sometimes explicitly not
for unicode we need to turn two '' into a double and ''' into a and
triple such
that said, in context these thingies are at some point intercepted and
their current state is looked at: superscript? multipel in a row? one ebing the nucleus of another ... etc .. the current (working again) behavior is what we support and i don't look forward to more heuristics
The following PDF have been obtained with mkii and mkiv with the
following example code.
Best regards: OK
%%% begin derivatives-prime.tex \starttext
\startformula f''_{2}(x) = f_{2}''(x) = f^{''}_{2}(x) = f_{2}^{''}(x) % = f^{{}^{''}}_{2}(x) \stopformula As one may see the result of \type{f_{2}''(x) = } $f_{2}''(x)$ is not correct in \type{mkiv}.
The following positions of the superscripts \type{(3)} are correct both in \type{mkii} and in \type{mkiv}. \startformula f^{(3)}_{2}(x) = f_{2}^{(3)}(x) \stopformula
\stoptext %%% end derivatives-prime.tex
____________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/ listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ____________________________________________________________
--
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ____________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/ listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________ _______________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/ listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ____________________________________________________________ _______________________ OK, very good, it seems that we have a working solution and one specific way to write it. I have absolutely nothing against that, but I would like us (me?) to document it, since I think future users might have use of it. Is the math page in the wiki the right place? (It will take some time before I will be able to act. I'm currently travelling with close to no working connection.) /Mikael