Alan BRASLAU írta:
On Mon, 4 May 2015 17:54:31 +0200 Csikos Bela wrote:
I could set up superscript citation for numerical citation based on contextgarden bibliography page example.
A MKII hack...
Let me understand, though. Do you want to mix\high{1} citations with [1] citations? That would be rather strange, stylistically.
Yes, but in tables I don't want to put superscript citations.
OK, thanks for explaining this use.
There is a predefined second num cite variant \cite[textnum][tag]. It's use is intended to produce something like ref. 1, to be used syntactically in a sentence, in conjunction with standard num references. [1] This is just num setup with [left={ref.\nbsp},right=].
I guess this command would fit my needs after some editing. Unfortunately my context version doesn't have this command.
Using \cite[textnum][tag] simply outputs "[tag]".
Either I should update my context to newer (beta?), which I don't know how to do, or define the command in the document. I'd prefer the latter one, if feasible.
You are using the MKII code. It takes the syntax \cite[alternative]{key} which is very intolerant of spacing and the newer module has abandoned this LaTeX style in favor of \cite[key] and \cite[alternative][key]
I recommend that you stick with the MKII module/code for now as we have not yet entirely stabilized the new dataset code.
Thanks. But there's no any indication in the log file of using mkII, unless mkiv uses the same code. All \cite[alternative][key] variants work for me except the \cite[textnum][key] variant. See the attached example tex file with its pdf output and log file. My question still is how I could define an alternative \cite command for numerical citations, e.g. \cite[textnum]. Thanks, bcsikos