![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c5ae4f9aa0d3a9bd5376e92b322c3e50.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Maurice Diamantini wrote:
Le 12 avr. 07 à 07:37, Thomas A. Schmitz a écrit :
... There are fast approaching competitors that will eventually overtake LaTeX if we continue to stagnate. (Not to mention ConTeXt, which has surpassed LaTeX in essentially every area. Maybe the solution is just for everyone to switch to that.)
Except for reference documentation or book (no need for a "s" here!).
While starting ConTeXt, I found ConTeXt an excrusion and ConTeXt manual to be extremely well written, much better than what I had read for LaTeX (but then, I never bought a LaTeX book). What do you find missing in the ConTeXt documentation that a book should cover? I know that there are certain places where the documentation is a bit old and outdated, but given the pace at which ConTeXt is developed, that will happen with any reference book. Aditya