On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 17:38, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 01:02, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The minimals version of tikz is old.
Hmmm ... what exactly did I miss?
Updating the description page :) I just looked at the description page which still talks about
Current version: 2.00 In sync with CTAN: yes
Blame Patrick for that :) :) :) He just added some random field to description of modules whose value always says "yes". The module is not synced on CTAN, but it is not updated on modules.contextgarden.net either. I need to delete it (or do something else with it). For tikz I use a special script that updates it from CVS for the minimals; all other modules are synced from modules.contextgarden.net.
So, if it is in sync with CTAN, it cannot be the CVS version ;) I did not actually test it. Sorry for the noise.
But you might have been right about your "your're using too old version" after all :) :) :) On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 17:12, Till Tantau wrote:
Hi!
I have just commited a patch to CVS that should fix the problem. (I could not try out the minimal example you sketch below because, for some reason, context in this miniversion fails to load the tikz module. But I hope my patch will fix this problem in luatex+context).
Note that the context color support is still far from perfect, but better than nothing.
I hope you will be able to test ... I'm leaving now. Mojca