Re: [NTG-context] position of qed symbol in proofs

Hi Mikael, In my files I have the following which used to work, but it doesn’t work as expected anymore, as you point out \defineenumeration[proof][text=Proof.] \setupenumeration[proof] [number=no, closesymbol=\mathematics{\square}, closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi] \starttext \startproof This is a simple proof. \stopproof \startproof This is another simple proof that ends with a formula \startformula 1+1=2. \stopformula \stopproof \stoptext I don’t know when the change occurred, but at least it worked last year (which for ConTeXt means pregistoric times… :—). As a temporary hack one can always say: \startformula 1+1=2. \eqno{\square} \stopformula Best regards: OK

On 08 Nov 2014, at 14:40, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:

...

Hi,

I once used

\defineenumeration[proof][ text=Proof, closesymbol=\mathematics{\square}, closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi, ]

\starttext \startproof This is a simple proof. \stopproof

\startproof This is another simple proof that ends with a formula \startformula 1+1=2. \stopformula \stopproof \stoptext

to get the \square at the end of proofs, and it worked out well. But with the latest beta (and some previous one(s)), the \square is not placed at the same line as the formula in the second example. Is it broken? Or is there a new syntax?

PDF with my result is attached.

Best regards, Mikael

I don't like to bump, but... Noone else has this problem?

@Hans: Is it easily fixed?

/Mikael ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________