27 Feb
2008
27 Feb
'08
5:50 a.m.
On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:33 AM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Thank you Mojca, it seems to make sense all of a sudden: I think those two accents are simply a mistake, and we should replace the
sequence by the appropriate Unicode character. That's what Alexej Kryukov has done in his antomega package (see lines 1271 and 1816 of TeX Live's texmf-dist/tex/lambda/antomega/ograhyph4.tex). Thomas?
That was my guess too, and I simply remapped those two patterns. They are simple typos:
l. 1739 >e3s2ou': should have been >e3s2o'u l. 1194 >a2n1wdu': should have been >a2n1wd'u
With the nifty remap feature, we can just substitute the correct value. Thanks for investigating! Thomas