\def\font_typescript_process_typescript_file_and_store
{*\expandafter\let\expandafter\t_font_typescripts\csname\??typescriptfiles\currenttypefile\endcsname
A\ifx\t_font_typescripts\relax
B\font_typescript_process_typescript_store_indeed
C\fi
D\the\t_font_typescripts}
The ABCD*'s were added to see what happens. See the screen shot from one of my tests (<br/> results in \crlf but does not sit between text and fontswitch \switchtobodyfont). My guess is that the token register \t_font_typescripts is the source of the spaces,
but I am not further than that. I have already mailed Hans Hagen about these findings.
Hans van der Meer
wrote:
Am 02.05.2013 um 12:40 schrieb "Meer, H. van der" <H.vanderMeer@uva.nl>:
A call to \switchtobodyfont introduces extra vertical spacing as can be seen in the example.
Is this intentional or is it something like a % missing somewhere in a macro?
Hans van der Meer
Sorry, flew accidentally to early away. Here the attached output.
\setuppapersize[A6][A6]
\setupbodyfont[lucidaot]
\starttext
First line.\crlf
\start
\switchtobodyfont[euler]
Font switch here.\crlf
\stop
Last line.
\hairline
First line.\crlf
\start
Font switch here.\crlf
\stop
Last line.
\stoptext
Is there a reason why you use \crlf to end the lines?
When you would end the paragraph after each line the additional line wouldn't appear.