On Mon, 8 May 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi Aditya,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
However, the bib module does not support this naming scheme. I get
\month{1} \month{2}
etc in my bbl file. Can this be corrected?
Sure, it is just an oversight. For this to work, only a redefinition of \insertmonth is needed (I had intented that all along, just forgot to implement it), For now, just add this somewhere after the loading of the bib module.
\unprotect \def\insertmonth#1#2#3% {\bibdoifelse{\@@pb@month}% {#1\doifnumberelse{\@@pb@month}% {\@EA\doconvertmonth\@EA{\@@pb@month}}% {\@@pb@month}#2}{#3}} \protect
That will give you the full month name according to the current language labeltext for the month names. Not perfect yet, but better.
Thanks. For my present project I need short month names, and the deadline is tomorrow. So, I will stick to the manual solution at the moment.
I'll ask Hans to provide true \numberconversions for month names in short and long format, so I can extend the module officially.
That will be great. Aditya -- Aditya Mahajan, EECS Systems, University of Michigan http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam || Ph: 7342624008