On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 15:28, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2-3-2010 14:49, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
hm, but for me name compatibility with every latex math package is no objective; i'd rather that we're unicode math compiant (and i don't care too much what route latex follows)
I would not care too much about LaTeX either, but what does Unicode compliance mean?
\symbol{DOWNWARDS ARROW LEFTWARDS OF UPWARDS ARROW}?
Out of the whole vector only some 5-10% of glyphs works now.
is it that bad? interesting is that lucida was one of the first fonts context supported so the transition from yandy->tug has really messed up things then
It's not about messing things up, but about missing "mathname=" in char-def.lua for all the unicode entries for special glyphs. If those glyphs worked in MKII from the very beginning, they won't work before one adds several entries to
But of course they should work flawlessly when they are entered as unicode characters. They only fail to work when one enters \zrangeantirestriction for example.
I'm sorry, this is just my comment from the unicode chart. I'm pretty sure that won't work. I download the chart, compare the symbols in the tables one by one without even knowing the meanings. Is there like a table of macros of all symbols?
Mojca
-- Best Regards Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------- Zhi-chu Chen | Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility No. 2019 | Jialuo Rd. | Jiading | Shanghai | P.R. China tel: 086 21 5955 3405 | zhichu.chen.googlepages.com | www.sinap.ac.cn ----------------------------------------------------------------