Am 05.04.2011 03:19, schrieb Cecil Westerhof:
2011/4/4 Wolfgang Schuster
mailto:schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> http://www.pragma-ade.com/show-man-22.htm
I tried the first example from fill-in fields: \starttext
A few years back, \TEX\ could only produce \fillinfield [dvi]{\DVI} output, but nowadays, thanks to \fillinfield {Han The Thanh}, we can also directly produce \fillinfield [pdf] {\PDF}! Nice eh? Actually, while the first field module was prototyped in \ACROBAT, the current implementation was debugged in \fillinfield [pdfTeX] {\PDFTEX}. Field support in \fillinfield [ConTeXt] {\CONTEXT} is rather advanced and complete and all kind of fields are supported. One can hook in appearances, and validation \fillinfield [JavaScripts] {\JAVASCRIPT}’s. Fields can be cloned and copied, where the latter saves some space. By using \fillinfield {objects} when suited, this module saves space anyway.
\stoptext
But I get: mtx-context | run 1: luatex --fmt="/home/cecil/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/cont-en" --lua="/home/cecil/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/cont-en.lui" --backend="pdf" "./test" This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.65.0-2010121316 \write18 enabled. (test.tex
ConTeXt ver: 2011.03.27 14:48 MKIV fmt: 2011.3.27 int: english/english
system > cont-new.mkiv loaded (/home/cecil/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/cont-new.mkiv system > beware: some patches loaded from cont-new.mkiv ) system > test.top loaded (test.top) fonts > latin modern fonts are not preloaded languages > language en is active {/home/cecil/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-context/fonts/map/pdftex/context/mkiv-base.map} fonts > preloading latin modern fonts (second stage) (/home/cecil/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-siz.mkiv) (/home/cecil/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.mkiv){/home/cecil/ConTeXt/tex/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/lm/lm-math.map}{/home/cecil/ConTeXt/tex/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/lm/lm-rm.map} fonts > virtual math > unable to resolve name mapsfromchar fonts > fallback modern rm 12pt is loaded system > begin file test at line 1 ! Undefined control sequence.
system > tex > error on line 4 in file test.tex: Undefined control sequence ...
\def\DVI{DVI} \def\PDF{PDF} \def\ACROBAT{Acrobat} \def\JAVASCRIPT{Javascript}
1 \starttext 2 3 A few years back, \TEX\ could only produce 4 >> \fillinfield [dvi]{\DVI} output, 5 but nowadays, thanks to \fillinfield {Han The Thanh}, we can also directly produce \fillinfield [pdf] {\PDF}! 6 Nice eh? Actually, while the first field module was prototyped 7 in \ACROBAT, the current implementation was debugged in 8 \fillinfield [pdfTeX] {\PDFTEX}. Field support in \fillinfield 9 [ConTeXt] {\CONTEXT} is rather advanced and complete and all 10 kind of fields are supported. One can hook in appearances, and 11 validation \fillinfield [JavaScripts] {\JAVASCRIPT}’s. Fields 12 can be cloned and copied, where the latter saves some space. By 13 using \fillinfield {objects} when suited, this module saves 14 space anyway.
l.4 \fillinfield [dvi]{\DVI} output,
What is happening here?
I guess Hans has removed some obsolete definitions :-) Best wishes, Peter
-- Cecil Westerhof
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________