![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5955e8e90611e77ccbfc7721b6112027.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Dear list, I have two questions about the following sample: \startbuffer[demo] <doc>Two links: <a>Document 1</a>, <em><a>Document 2</a></em>. And <em><em>different</em></em> results.</doc> \stopbuffer \startxmlsetups xml:initialize \xmlsetsetup{#1}{*}{-} \xmlsetsetup{#1}{doc|em}{xml:*} %~ \xmlsetsetup{#1}{(a|em/a)}{xml:linked} %~ \xmlsetsetup{#1}{(a or em/a)}{xml:linked} \xmlsetsetup{#1}{a}{xml:linked} \xmlsetsetup{#1}{em/a}{xml:linked} \stopxmlsetups \xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize} \startxmlsetups xml:doc \xmlflush{#1} \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:em \bgroup\em\xmlflush{#1}\egroup \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:linked \bgroup\em\xmlflush{#1}\egroup \stopxmlsetups \starttext \xmlprocessbuffer{main}{demo}{} \stoptext The first issue is why doesn’t the lpaths with "or" and "|" don’t work. Or at least, they give a different result from defining each lpath separately. The second issue is why the lpath em/a gets double emphasis. Since I seem to be missing something, which is the way to avoid that the em/a lpath doesn’t get the em lpath applied? (I mean, that "Document 2" only gets an emphasis.) Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk