Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
(Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow)
char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as basemark but ... Actually, 1617 (shadda) and 1615 (fatha) will form a shadda-fatha
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: ligature, thus there is no proper mkmk anchors between both. hm, they won't because 1615 becomes an initial and therefore an other character
I'm not sure if I understand this, do marks have initial and other forms?
also, i wonder if this is ok:
["char"]="shaddaKasra", ["components"]="shadda fatha",
The ligature is OK, just the name is wrong (I named it wrongly while asleep or something).
no, but we have \char 1605\char1617\char1614 which becomes: \char57392\char1617\char1614\par so, if you want such a ligature you need to ligature \char57392\char1617 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------