Le 29 août 08 à 12:00, Yue Wang a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ
wrote: Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says ****************************************** \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}} \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{10.80}} \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}} \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}} \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{17.72}} \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{21.25}} ****************************************** Shouldn't it says ****************************************** \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.920}} \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{1.080}} \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}} \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}} \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}} \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}} ****************************************** ?
How do you get these variables? the symbols in lucida math are different.
I just divided the size by 10 with a modification for big (doesn't understand why, see the second part of my question). They look like the sizes in math-tex ****************************************** \def\PLAINbig {\@@dobig{0.85}} \def\PLAINBig {\@@dobig{1.15}} \def\PLAINbigg{\@@dobig{1.45}} \def\PLAINBigg{\@@dobig{1.75}} ******************************************
you can also refer to ftp://ftp.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/pub/TeX/CTAN/macros/latex/contrib/psnfssx/lucidabr/lucidabr.pdf . page 9, line 263-273
Indeed the original sizes are the same. But the lucidabr package uses 8.20 pt and context uses a multiple of fontsize : ****************************************** \def\@@dobig#1#2% {{\hbox{$\left#2\vbox\!!to#1\bodyfontsize{}\right.\n@space$}}} ****************************************** Does anybody understand why big with \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.930}} is bigger than Big with \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{1.080}} ?
There is a strange behavior : if I put \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.930}} big is bigger than Big. How is this possible ?