![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 15-10-2012 16:58, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 15.10.2012 um 13:45 schrieb Otared Kavian
: Hi Andreas, Wolfgang and Aditya,
Thanks for your attention and suggesting a fix. However, after I applied the change mentioned by Andreas for the definition of \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering in cont-new.mkiv and made the formats anew, the subformulas are not numbered as expected. Probably we have to wait for a fix from Hans in an upcoming beta.
@Wolfgang: can the typo you mention in font-new.mkiv be easily fixed?
Yes and Hans wil fix it in the next beta but this doesn’t fix the problem with the wrong numbering because the problem for this lies somewhere else.
let's first catch up on other reported issues (I can't find the bugged example anyway). Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------