Mojca Miklavec wrote:
LuaTeX will probably support those old encodings, but you would want to use "uc" (unicode) encoding for both engines, otherwise it makes no sense to use XeTeX instead of pdfTeX at all.
luatex itself has still the pdftex machinery around, so you can use map files to handle things when you use for instance type one fonts. ttf and otf are supported as wide fonts, but of course one needs to make sure that the unicode to glyph mapping is ok in context mkiv i will intercept the encoding-prefixed fonts (texnansi-mojca-regular) so this is transparent for users by using some lua glue code but mainly because i read afm files instead of tfm files (so, texnansi-mojca will in fact use mojca.afm); non prefixed names will use the tfm file (this is pretty safe because the texnansi-* names were only there when proper afm files are also there; i mainly provide this features for existing typescripts) in general, encodings are not something to worry about not even uc as encoding is needed in mkiv
All of your questions mentioned here belong to the ConTeXt mailing list (XeTeX mailing list is mostly for XeLaTeX and low-level XeTeX discussions) since it's really about the ConTeXt user-interface. The only thing you could ask for on the XeTeX list is the question of supporting ec/texnansi-encoded fonts (I prefer to wait for luaTeX than to bother about those "soon-to-become-obsolete" additions).
indeed, there is no need to mess up xetex with obsolete encoding stuff; luatex will still have much pdftex code around so there the penalty is less, but eventually users have to move on Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------