On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
I suspect the error is not in lefthyphenmin and righthyphenmin, but in the patterns themselves. Which patterns does mkiv actually use, and how have they been produced?
It uses the patterns `dehypht-x' 2008-06-18 (WL)
Wait!!! Have de and deo been switched???? { "de", "hyph-de-1901.tex", "german, old spelling" }, { "deo", "hyph-de-1996.tex", "german, new spelling" },
hey, didn't *you* check that?
I should have checked, yes. I did, but I oversaw this. I admit, it's all my fault (lucky me that I don't know the differences between the two orthographies well enough).
ok, i swapped them in mtx-patterns and swapped the de and deo files in my tree
There have recently been some more changes (for example Hungarian now includes way more extensive patterns, and Lithuanian and Latvian have been added, but there's no support for the two languages in ConTeXt anyway). Just FYI. (Just out of curiosity - why has { "agr", "hyph-grc", "ancient greek" } been commented out? My next question to Thomas would be how you handle those patterns in pdftex, but I won't ask that.)
ok, luatex has a reimplemented hyphenation machinery so that may be a reason; another can be that we don't use the german patterns at all although i do see a difference ..
My fear is that there could be some tiny difference in that reimplementation of hyphenation algorithm. Most words hyphenate properly and equally in both engines. This is the first counter-example that I have seen. But that might be something for Taco to check. Mojca