![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6114858d84b0f40cf715f12237ab67a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...] Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77 specific functionality
there will be a luajittex 0.78.1 soon (there is already a binary for windows, as Akira always provides the latest greatest)
I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to be broken.
Which one? 32-bit or 64-bit linux (linux or linux-64)?
Linux 32-bits is my architecture.
I failed to automatically compile 32-bit binaries (and I would have to remember how to switch the compiler and simply didn't care enough at the time to take the effort + we have problems with weirdly misbehaving subversion without proper understanding what could go wrong, so some binary builders weren't even able to submit their binaries). If that fails it might be due to version mismatch which means that I need to build the binary first.
I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.
Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has proliferated to the distribution already.) Mojca