Hans Hagen
Mohamed Bana wrote:
Sorry I didn't quiet understand that. Given this;
$ mtxrun --script fonts --list --pattern=warnock warnockpro-bold WarnockPro-Bold WarnockPro-Bold.otf ....
looks like an old version, should be
warnockprobold WarnockPro-Bold <fullpathifsystemfont>/WarnockPro-Bold.otf
which of the following are correct;
1. \definefontsynonym [WarnockPro-Regular] [name:warnockpro-bold]
best use
name:warnockprobold
although context will strip the - anyway
Thanks, I can confirm that both \definefontsynonym [WarnockPro-Regular] [name:warnockproregular] and \definefontsynonym [WarnockPro-Regular] [name:WarnockPro-Regular] on my vista box, which is running a pretty update to ConTeXt install, it's actually the mswincontext.zip. And the output is as Hans described.
can you try the beta? something was fixed
The lastest LuaTeX or ConTeXt? Because if it's the ConTeXt beta then where's the link, I generally just download the cont-tmf.zip from http://www.pragma-ade.nl/download-1.htm, and the current one is dated at; 2008-08-05. Or even better, how do I update a local ConTeXt install in $HOME/texmf